User talk:Tuvalkin
 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||
Category:VV as W[edit]
This category is now having no files, as all look like migrated to Category:W as VV, no idea if the previous one can be {{Category redirect}}ed to later one or not? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- Obviously not, as they are different concepts, fully symmetric. If it’s empty, it should be tagged with {{Prospective category}}. It is likely, though, that it is empty because its contents were wongly moved due to misunderstanding of both categories vis-a-vis each other, and those misedits should be identified and undone ASAP. I would further ask you to futurely start this kind of discussion in the relevant file or category talk page, not in a user’s talk page. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 04:18, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Eliminação?[edit]
Oi Tuvalkin, tudo bem?
Estou um pouco ferrugento nas regras de eliminação aqui do Commons, podias dar-me uma ajuda com uma coisa?
Encontrei duas imagens que acho serem redundantes: File:Restauradores metro station (40463484690).jpg e File:Fools Errand Trying to visit (41549050054).jpg.
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
A segunda é simplesmente um crop da primeira, mantendo a mesma resolução.
Existe alguma regra de eliminação aplicável nestes casos? Obrigado! Cmpts, EuTuga msg 18:53, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Parece-me que este caso está liminarmente relacionado com {{Duplicate}}, mas havendo duas imagens originais em separado, é melhor criar um DR (enlace q diz «Nominate for deletion» na barra lateral) — se achares que realmente vale a pena o trabalho. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 03:46, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Category:Book_volumes_as_Roman_numerals[edit]
|
Book volumes as Roman numerals has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Ricky81682 (talk) 08:59, 7 October 2021 (UTC)